Sunday, March 2, 2008

Education: Turbulent Times

Parents raising children with autistic disorders know all too well that the disorder can wreak havoc on a family budget. Faced with rising health insurance premiums, out-of-pocket medical costs, and serious limitations on covered expenses; these families have had to make some very difficult choices. No one understands the budget constraints and the financial balancing act required better than the parents of autistic children!

Schools too, have felt the pinch. Legally a public school must provide a free and appropriate education to every student enrolled in their district. When the student requires special education services that the school cannot provide; the district must send them outside of the school district to receive these services. This can be an extremely costly measure and the district usually tries to fight such action.

Some school districts have taken a very responsible approach to special education and have opted to add services to their special education budget. These are the schools that realize that early intervention has proven to be the most effective means for educating these students. If these students are taught social and communication skills early on and if they are specifically trained in methods to regulate their behaviors, and if they receive the therapies required; many will go on to achieve academic success. They will lead productive lives and become active members of their communities. This however, requires intervention at the earliest stages of their education.

Sadly, some school districts have portrayed a much bleaker picture that has pitted regular education parents against the parents of children with special needs. Some school districts claim that they cannot provide other services for their regular ed population because of rising special education costs. They portray special education as something that is bleeding the school budget dry. What is most disturbing is that these are usually the same districts that provide the least amount of support for special education students.

Unfortunately, Cherry Hill Schools began to fit that profile over the last two years. Faced with an explosion in autistic students about to enter the school district, our new administrators began slashing the very programs to support these students. At the same time, they began a trend of denying services to special ed students already enrolled. Many students lost therapy services and 1:1 aides. Students with little ability to adapt were suddenly thrust into mainstream classrooms. Many could not transition to this mainstream environment and suffered the consequences daily.

The parents of these children were faced with the difficult decisions of utilizing funds to meet their child's medical needs vs. hiring an attorney to fight the school district. Some parents had to resort to home schooling their child while they battled with the school district for an appropriate education. No parent should have to face such an ordeal!

Over the last two years, as all of this began to play out, school budget debates were focusing on the IB program, after school sports expenses and other issues that regular ed parents were concerned about. Ironically, one of the key reasons stated for the proposed elimination of certain regular ed activities was because of rising special education costs. In reality, many of the special education services were being taken away. This seemed to be a calculated means of pitting parents against one another.

This year we have seen a new trend emerge. As more families are touched by autism and other special education concerns, the community began to unite on these issues. Many families of typical children have friends and/or family members raising a disabled child. That alone started the trend of unity in Cherry Hill. We also happen to live in a town where residents look out for one another. I have received so many emails and comments from parents of typical children, that are deeply concerned about the state of special education services in our schools. Some of that is fueled by the fact that many of our special needs children are being integrated into the mainstream environment. These parents see first hand how it becomes inter-related. What effects my child, now effects yours!

This became abundantly clear during the issue many now refer to as the "Quiet Room." I had more parents of typical students comment in my blogs about that issue than any other blog I had written! They were appalled that our school district would think it was acceptable to discipline any child in that manner.

Many of the residents that I have spoken with are furious over the special education cutbacks that led to this scenario. When our special needs children are denied critical services and supports, it usually manifests into behavioral problems. To have a school district that wanted to discipline an autistic child, rather than teach the skills to modify their behavior, was simply not acceptable to any parent in Cherry Hill. As pictures of the Quiet Room (or padded closet) were portrayed on every local TV News station, parents became outraged at our school district. Soon those pictures hit the national news and our school district suffered a black eye. Most parents (special ed and regular ed) agreed that this was a terrible way to treat any child!

It is unfair to the students that require special education services to suffer the consequences of not receiving them. Many parents in our school district are highly upset that they voted for a tax increase last year, based in part on rising special education costs, when the funds were not utilized for special education. These parents want to see more transparency and have become quite vocal about it! They feel that they were lied to by school administrators and the board of education.

Although we have a school district facing turbulent times, I still feel that our community is a great place to live and raise our children. A big reason for that is the result of parents helping each other. It is a comfort to know that our community, as a whole, will not tolerate a reduction in educational services to our typical children or our special needs children! Please do not let our school officials define who we are. Cherry Hill has many responsible, caring residents that understand the impact that our school district has on our children. We are consumers of their product. We put our children in their hands to learn and grow and develop skills that will last a lifetime. The education that our children receive should never be compromised based on race, ethnicity, family wealth or a disability classification. We are all residents of a great community and we all need to stand up and reclaim our schools!

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

Kathi, Why didn't you run for the board of ed? You could have helped CH parents so much with your knowledge of the issues, not just special ed. I love that you are a problem solver. Imagine how many other issues you could have addressed if you were on the board.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the kind words! I did give it a great deal of thought, but I am currently over-committed and I didn't feel that I could have served the public to the capacity expected as a board member.

I was also concerned because I see a due process hearing in our future! I have tried so hard to avoid that, knowing that it will ultimately cost all of us as taxpayers -- but I have to look out for my son. He was denied critical instruction, which I feel is based on his disability and the fact that he was in a self-contained SE classroom. It breaks my heart to know that his placement interfered with his opportunity to receive an appropriate education. If I had any idea that the Core Curriculum was not followed in self contained SE classrooms, I would have never allowed him to be placed there!

There are rules about not being able to serve on the board if you have an active suit against the school district. Although it would not have interfered with my "running for the board" I did not want to be in a position of having to step down once I committed myself to serving the public.

Maybe next year!

Anonymous said...

Kathi,

I was looking for your Courier Post blog, but "The page could not be found (404)." I am assuming that the blog on that site has been discontinued. Is that correct?

I'm glad to see you are still writing, though. :-)

Anonymous said...

My blog is still on the Courier Post. When they changed their online format and switched to another blog software program, readers had difficulty finding specific blogs. The CP runs a "blog roll" with the most recently updated blogs appearing on the list. It created some confusion with locating certain blogs, especially the special interest blogs.

South Jersey Moms (www.sojerseymoms.com) which is also owned by Gannett News, carries a link to my blog as well. I have several different outlets that want to link to it and have been trying to accomodate all of them.

Blogspot had a solution that seemed to accomodate everyone, so here I am! I can keep all of the reader comments together this way. Let's face it, people don't tune in to read my words -- they like to read the comments!

Thanks for following the blog!
Kathi Magee

Anonymous said...

Kathi,

I'd very much like to know who you plan to vote for for the School Board. I assume you like Stu and Nancy. But who else?

In the (awfully likely) event that the $14 million spending increase in this year's budget isn't needed for an historic level of enrollment growth and a huge increase in special ed needs, the board will be asked to rubber stamp whatever the administration decides to spend the excess on. (I'll bet that it won't be allowed to be added to surplus and reduce taxes in the next year.)

Who do you believe is sufficiently responsible not to waste this extra money extracted from the Cherry Hill taxpayers?

Anonymous said...

Here's a link to a good article that is on the Wrightslaw site:
http://www.wrightslaw.com/law/art/draper.aps.comped.htm

Their last Special Ed Advocate newsletter discussed the Draper case.

Note the “Air of Disdain & Tone of Contempt” that is mentioned in the article.

Also note that the family was not represented by an attorney, but by the boy's aunt! The ruling was just upheld by the US court of Appeals to boot!

The ruling ordered the Atlanta School District to pay the boy's tuition at a private special education school for four years, or until he graduated with a diploma from high school, as prospective compensatory education for their persistent failure to educate him. He is currently 20 yrs old (I believe) and was reading at a 3rd grade level because his dyslexia was not properly diagnosed nor addressed by the public schools he attended.

Anonymous said...

Ok, so the link didn't show up completely. Starting at the .aps., the end part of the link is .aps.comped.htm